Nursing Home Guilty of Abuse Pushes to Change Rules Limit Legal Exposure

Many times, in the world of nursing home litigation and medical malpractice, you hear things like “caps on damages,” “tort reform,” of “medical review panels.”  These measures are presented as ways to “Stop the crisis!” or “Reign in out of control juries!”  The reality is, there is no crisis, juries are reasonable, and these measures are usually promulgated by nursing home companies solely to avoid liability.

A recent article from WFPL in Louisville, KY, recounts the story of Hazard Health and Rehab Center.  Within the walls of that facility, among other issues, two residents sexually abused a 91 year-old resident and another resident suffered a “gaping pressure ulcer.”  For the sex abuse, the facility paid a fine of $20,000, and for both incidents the facility was sued in civil court.

The nursing home industry in that state backed by among others state Republicans and the Kentucky Chamber of Commerce, want to make-up a law that will require a board of three “healthcare providers” that screen cases for merit – before a plaintiff can even file a lawsuit. This is designed to be yet another hurdle to achieving timely justice.   Helping to bankroll this idea?  Hazard Health and Rehab.

The article goes on to state that it’s the poor state of health care in KY is what’s causing the legal problems, not the law.  According to the article KY has more below average nursing homes than all but 8 other states.  “That just shows there’s widespread abuse, neglect, mistreatment of residents occurring in far too many nursing homes,” said Brian Lee, executive director of Families for Better Care.

You can read the full article here.

Be cautious whenever you hear of measures that limit a person’s ability to hold anyone person or company accountable in court.  There’s usually a lot of money behind the idea, and very little consideration for the good of the population. If you have any questions about a Nursing Home situation, contact Stark & Stark today.

 

Stark & Stark Spotlight on Continuing Care Retirement Communities

Acquiring continuing care–in a community setting–requires a major financial investment by both the consumer and the provider. For the consumer, doing so may involve spending most or all of a lifetime of savings; and for the provider, delivering promised services during the resident’s stay requires sound financial and actuarial management. The following will assist consumers or potential residents in considering Continuing Care Retirement Communities (CCRC).

New Jersey and Pennsylvania Nursing Homes Have Plenty of Room for Improvement

The second edition of the State Long-Term services and Supports (LTSS) Scorecard (2014), sponsored, in part, by the AARP, assigned New Jersey a 26th, and Pennsylvania a 42nd, overall ranking based on performance across twenty-six indicators, grouped into five dimensions, which include (1) affordability and access, (2) choice of setting and provider, (3) quality of life and quality of care, (4) support for family caregivers, and (5) effective transitions.

Residents Deserve Better Staffing

Though we’ve always known that poor staffing leads to falls and pressure ulcers, new research shows that Norovirus is also causally linked to poorly staffed nursing homes. The Journal for the American Medical Association recently published these findings and they are summarized in an article by Dr. Jeffry Levine.

New Study Shows Many People Unknowingly Receiving Medications For “Off Label” Uses

Ask any family member caring for an elderly parent with dementia about the number of medications prescribed and it’s likely to be quite a few. It is important to know what someone is prescribed and what for. A new study shows that roughly 20% of medications are prescribed “off label”. You can read an article discussing the study here.

Blog Categories