Appellate Division Rejects Notion That Members Can Simply Assent and Not Agree to the Terms of a Newly Drafted Operating Agreement

On May 26, 2021, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division issued an important decision in Premier Physician Network, LLC v. Robert Maro, Jr., M.D., et al, (Docket No. A-1152-20) concerning the governance of New Jersey limited liability companies (LLC). The issue before the Court was whether members of an LLC were bound by the terms of an operating agreement by assent as set forth in N.J.S.A. 42:2C-12(b), which states that “[a] person that becomes a member of a limited liability company is deemed to assent to the operating agreement.” The Court held that a draft operating agreement does not become the operating agreement of an LLC unless there is an agreement of the members. Further, that assent only bounds future members of an LLC to an already agreed upon operating agreement.

Read More about Appellate Division Rejects Notion That Members Can Simply Assent and Not Agree to the Terms of a Newly Drafted Operating Agreement

Undue Influence as a Challenge to Lifetime Gifts

An action setting forth a claim of undue influence is among the most common methods of contesting a will; however, an action for undue influence can also be effective in challenging lifetime gifts. As a general matter, undue influence is defined as mental, moral, or physical exertion which has destroyed the free agency of a party by preventing that party from following the dictates of his own mind and will and accepting instead the domination and influence of another. A plaintiff claiming undue influence has the burden of demonstrating a confidential relationship between the donor and the donee.

Read More about Undue Influence as a Challenge to Lifetime Gifts

A Cyberlaw Preparedness Primer for Businesses

As the dust settles on the legal battle between Apple and the F.B.I., businesses should take note of the many issues related to the privacy and confidentiality of electronically stored information. Though Apple arguably emerged victorious in refusing to create a backdoor for its security measures, the still unknown point of access utilized by the F.B.I. highlights the risk that electronically stored information is never truly secure. Data breaches at Sony, Home Depot, Target, and even within the federal government highlight this point.

Given their volume and value of data, businesses need to be particularly cognizant of the cyber-threats and nimble in response to cyber-attacks. However, it is not enough to simply recognize the threat posed by a cyber-attack. Businesses need to be prepared to act swiftly and effectively to prevent any further misappropriation or transmission of electronically stored information.

Read More about A Cyberlaw Preparedness Primer for Businesses

Read the Fine Print. Is My Arbitration Clause Enforceable?

Arbitration agreements seem to permeate our society, though they often go unnoticed. Traditionally located in what is colloquially referred to as the “fine print,” arbitration clauses in contracts, or in use agreement or terms and conditions, can have a tremendous impact on a party’s right to bring an action before a court of competent jurisdiction. Without understanding the fine print, a party may unknowingly waive its right to a trial by jury and may be left to litigate before an arbitrator, which can be an individual or a panel, in a closed proceeding with a very narrow and difficult right to appeal the decision.

A preference for arbitration will vary and will usually fall to a party’s relative interests. For some, an enforceable arbitration agreement may be helpful, as it presents and expedited process and a non-public forum for dispute resolution. For others, this language may be harmful, as the costs of arbitration can be extremely burdensome relative to traditional court costs. The important thing is to understand what is included in the agreement and whether the language is effective in accomplishing that understanding.

Read More about Read the Fine Print. Is My Arbitration Clause Enforceable?

Agents of Liability: Can the Acts of Another Bind a Business?

Whether in time of economic growth or decline, all businesses must be mindful of potential liability. The nature and extent of liabilities has a direct effect on profits, which can hamper business growth and require cutbacks, among other things. Knowing where and how liabilities arise can prevent negative effects on profits, avoid litigation premised on unintended and unknown acts, and promote overall business well-being. Read More about Agents of Liability: Can the Acts of Another Bind a Business?

Joint Checking Accounts: Are Your Heirs at Risk?

In recent years, a common issue that a growing number of individuals face is how to care for themselves as they age. Healthcare, finances, and even routine errands can pose a significant challenge. Proper planning can ease the burden, but improper planning can create significant risks for both you and your heirs.

One easy trap for individuals to fall into is the creation of a joint checking account, or the addition of another person to an existing checking account, for the purposes of managing finances and purchasing daily essentials. The idea behind the strategy is to enable another individual to pay for your care when you no longer possess the ability. It not only serves as a matter of convenience in that you do not have to consistently reimburse others for expenses, but it also grants another individual the authority to ensure that your finances are in order. Moreover, this strategy involves a fairly simple process of a single trip to the bank and, in certain circumstances, no fee. But, the ease of this strategy comes with a cost. Upon your death, your heirs may not receive the money that you have deposited in that joint checking account.

Under New Jersey law, joint bank accounts are presumed to be created with a right of survivorship. This means that the surviving account holder would be entitled to all of the money deposited in the account, regardless of whether the surviving party deposited any money in the account and regardless of whether you actually intended that result. As a result, the money would never enter into your estate and never be paid to your heirs, even if that is what you actually intended.

Though, if you did not intend for the surviving account holder to acquire the whole interest in your joint account, your heirs may still protect your interest and rebut the presumption of survivorship. Courts have found that heirs have successfully rebutted the presumption of survivorship rights where there is a demonstration that the joint checking account was exclusively intended for the convenience of the true owner of the money in the account. As discussed above, this may come where the surviving party is added for the sole purpose of assisting the true owner in his or her financial affairs. Additionally, courts have found that heirs have successfully rebutted the presumption of survivorship rights where there is a demonstration of a confidential or close relationship between the surviving party and the true owner. If a confidential relationship is established, then the surviving party would be required to demonstrate that he or she did not exert any undue influence over the true owner in acquiring an interest in the joint checking account. While these methods can be used by your heirs to protect you actual intentions and interests, either method will most certainly involve litigation.

In planning your estate you can avoid future litigation and disputes through proper planning and full understanding of the legal implications of certain actions. Though a joint checking account may serve your short term needs, perhaps a power of attorney may be better serve your long term desires. Proper planning avoids unwanted outcomes. It can provide for your care and ensure that your heirs inherit your estate in accordance with your intent.

If you are looking to plan your estate or if you are an heir to an estate which you believe does not represent the intent of a deceased individual, it is strongly recommended that you consult with an attorney. The attorneys at Stark & Stark are very familiar with these issues and would be happy to guide you through the process.

Blog Categories